Japan moves closer to requiring third-party app stores

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iOS

The Japanese Fair Trade Commission is planning a raft of proposals that would emulate Europe's App Store regulations regarding Big Tech firms such as Apple and Google.

An Apple Store in Japan
An Apple Store in Japan



It may now be consulting with the public, but Japan's Fair Trade Commission (FTC) expects to begin enforcing its Big Tech regulations from December 18, 2025. The consultation comes after the plans were passed by Japan's House of Representatives and House of Councillors in 2024.

The country's FTC has issued what its announcement calls draft subordinate legislations. They are all part of Japan's Mobile Software Competition Act, and a summary document shows that the new law says Apple and Google must:


  • Allow third-party app stores

  • Allow alternative payment

  • Not favor their own apps or services

  • Allow users to choose their default apps

  • Enable users to freely move between apps and platforms

  • Allow developers to utilize the same OS functions as Apple and Google



The provision about not favoring their own apps and services extends to the "unjust use of acquired data." Apple and Google must not benefit from user data that they gather that is not then made available to third-party developers.

Throughout the new consultation document, the FTC recognizes that there can be security and privacy issues that affect how -- or if -- data can be shared. It also repeatedly acknowledges the difficulty of proving compliance.

Consequently, the new documentation also requires Apple and Google to create systems for disclosing regulatory details. And then to disclose the details of those systems to the FTC.

In theory, the proposed guidelines for Big Tech companies could be extended to cover many such firms. But for now Japan's FTC is singling out three of what it calls Specified Software Operators

  • Apple

  • iTunes KK

  • Google



That second one, iTunes KK, is a Japanese subsidiary of Apple, based in Tokyo. It's responsible for running the Japanese versions of the App Store and other Apple media.

Japan's FTC requires interested members of the public to submit opinions -- solely in Japanese -- by the end of June 13. A finalized set of guidelines is expected to be issued before the end of July.

Apple has not commented since the release of the FTC's consultation document. However, during the FTC's investigations, Apple did defend its App Store rules, insisting that they were fair and transparent.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    docbburkdocbburk Posts: 113member
    How is it that all these bureaucrats are overlooking how much of a security risk all these new regulations will create? If I was Apple I would offer 2 versions, IOS Secure, and IOS. Then report how many viruses, malware, and cybercrimes happen to each version. I do not want alternative app stores or to have to give my payment info to a third party. 
    williamlondondarelrex
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 7
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,800member
    So there will be reciprocal access to Sony and Nintendo online stores huh?  :smile: 
    elijahgneoncatdarelrex
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 7
    williamlondonwilliamlondon Posts: 1,493member
    docbburk said:
    How is it that all these bureaucrats are overlooking how much of a security risk all these new regulations will create? If I was Apple I would offer 2 versions, IOS Secure, and IOS. Then report how many viruses, malware, and cybercrimes happen to each version. I do not want alternative app stores or to have to give my payment info to a third party. 
    Lemmings and reactionary gov’t officials who have no original ideas whatsoever, but love to jump on the latest bandwagon.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 7
    SiTimesitime Posts: 95member
    danox said:
    So there will be reciprocal access to Sony and Nintendo online stores huh?  :smile: 
    It’s a little bit different in the video game console side of things because publishers can choose to release physical discs/cartridges of their games and consumers can buy those physical discs/cartridges from third-party actual stores.

    Maybe video game consoles should similarly be more open as well (there are reasonable arguments for that), but there is a viable alternative for purchasing console video games already. Not only is physical media a viable alternative, but it’s the only method I use for purchasing console video games (for those games that have an option between physical or digital).

    Eventually (presumably) video game consoles will go fully to digital-only purchases (with no hardware capability to even play physical media). But that hasn’t happened yet. The upcoming Switch 2, for example, will still have a slot for actual physical cartridges.
    edited May 16
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 7
    darelrexdarelrex Posts: 149member

    ...

    The provision about not favoring their own apps and services extends to the "unjust use of acquired data." Apple and Google must not benefit from user data that they gather that is not then made available to third-party developers.

    ...

    The idea that Apple is going to provide all third parties with the same access to the user's personal data as has Apple itself, is truly insane. Imagine if you banked at Chase, and Chase decided to share everything they know about you and your accounts with all third-party merchants who accept Chase credit cards. That would never, ever fly.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 7
    mikethemartianmikethemartian Posts: 1,679member
    danox said:
    So there will be reciprocal access to Sony and Nintendo online stores huh?  :smile: 
    How do the Sony and Nintendo online stores compare to Apple’s and Google’s app stores in size? 
    williamlondondarelrex
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 7
    jamesjrjamesjr Posts: 5member
    docbburk said:
    How is it that all these bureaucrats are overlooking how much of a security risk all these new regulations will create? If I was Apple I would offer 2 versions, IOS Secure, and IOS. Then report how many viruses, malware, and cybercrimes happen to each version. I do not want alternative app stores or to have to give my payment info to a third party. 
    Nice thats the beauty of this if YOU dont want another app store you wont be required to use one i also dont want another app store so i simply just wont use one and those who do want them can use them its users choice everyone chooses if they want the stock app store experience or they want a 3rd party one so long as im not forced to use a 3rd party app store why should i care wnat others choose to use on their devices.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.